Tuesday, January 21, 2020
HeinekenÃ¢â¬â¢s follows a differentiation business strategy and multi-domestic strategy. Heineken gains a competitive advantage by distinguishing their products by creating Premium Light beer line, portable draught beer system (DraughtKeg), and redesigning their bottles. Heineken Premium Light attracted customers without taking sales away from their other beer selection. The decision regarding the launch of their new product was to raise brand awareness in the U.S. market and react to changes in the growing global market. Major source of HeinekenÃ¢â¬â¢s revenue comes from their subsidiaries. The mergers and acquisitions of the local beer brands in niche markets such as the recent five brewers in Nigeria have provided a gain in the local market share. Using a multi-domestic strategy, a major source of revenue results from their subsidiaries and they have had an increase in sales since 2006. The raw materials needed to produce the beer are mainly supplied by farmers. Therefore, the bargaining power of these suppliers is high and can affect HeinekenÃ¢â¬â¢s costs. The consumers in the beer industry ha...
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Schlenz 1 Jarid Schlenz Professor Fahey English 1A 13 October 2011 Horror Movies Scare Us So Why Do We Watch Them? Scary, creepy, and downright disturbing images have existed in film, art, and literature as long as we have had the ability to invent them, perceive them and construct them. Not only have they simply existed, but they permeate these mediums: Ã¢â¬Å"horror has become a staple across contemporary art forms, popular and otherwise, spawning vampires, trolls, gremlins, zombies, werewolves, demonically possessed children, space monsters of all sizes, ghosts, and other unnameable concoctionsÃ¢â¬ (Carroll, 51).Horror is easily accessible to appease a growing appetite for scary in society. But why? Why would we want to put ourselves through the terror and agony of sitting on the edge of our seats, heart racing, sweaty palms, eyes squinted? It is one of the most frightening experiences to be at the mercy of someone or something else, yet we do it constantly and voluntarily. One of the reasons why we may feel the need to watch this genre of movie is to simply gain the excitement of living on the edge. Another may include the curiosity of the unknown, the unexpected, and the unseen, all of which are elements that that make a good horror movie good.While at the same time there is a need to watch others feel helpless, act under pressure and deal with the. Even the appeal of seeing a new creature or monster brings people to watch horror movies. But the unifying pull lies in the ability of experiencing something new without losing control. Schlenz 2 One reason often used to explain the desire and need to watch horror movies stems from physical reactions. There is the appeal of the adrenaline rush, which gives horror movies the same draw as a roller coaster at a theme park.The difference, however, is that horror movies lack the real danger of things that normally give humans an adrenaline rush. Even a roller coaster, which simulates deathly falls and flying at i ncredible speeds, contains the real danger of death if it malfunctions. But the act of watching a movie contains no danger. Still, Ã¢â¬Å"when people watch horrific images, their heartbeat increases as much as 15 beats per minuteÃ¢â¬ ¦ their palms sweat, their skin temperature drops several degrees, their muscles tense, and their blood pressure spikesÃ¢â¬ (Sine, 2). The affects of the scenes people watch are there, without any of the actual danger.This allows people to experience the thrill, high energy, and, perhaps, new sensations of being out of control, without ever relinquishing control of their surroundings and lives. More than just physical reactions, though, horror equally appeals to and disturbs the mind. One of the primary appeals, mentally, about horror is the unknown. The unknown, unexpected, and unseen disturb our sense of safety and comfort and our ideas of how the world should work. They take away the rules we use to deal with reality and make the familiar become unfamiliar. In the unknown anything could happen and anything could emerge from the darkness.The unknown takes away control, but it also excites curiosity. Our imaginations are so quick to run away with what is being presented to us that we are left clinging to our seats in desperation. Everything known comes from the unknown so it has an endless power to keep our attention. With our attention captive, and our minds guessing, the unknown allows movies to employ shock. Our stomach plummets when the killer rises again after being smashed in the head, shot, and pushed down the stairs. Unnatural creatures and occurrences make us feel uncomfortable and Schlenz 3 confused.This is sometimes referred to as the Ã¢â¬Å"shock horror,Ã¢â¬ or the Ã¢â¬Å"employment of graphic, visceral shock to access the historical substrate of traumatic experienceÃ¢â¬ (Lowenstein, 37). Shock horror intensifies the adrenaline and physical reactions to horror by engaging the mind as well. Many movies also c ombine shock horror with a sense of surrealism. The surrealist movement in art and film takes the familiar and adds a sense of distortion or unknown. Surrealism Ã¢â¬Å"might be better understood as a violent, embodied assault on the social structures propping up modernity,Ã¢â¬ (Lowenstein, 37).Again, people are drawn in by curiosity, captivated by the unknown aspect of surrealist images, and horrified by the results. When you watch a horror movie, most of the time you start to feel compassion for the victim and start to wonder how you would handle the situation and what you would do differently. It is hard to watch a horror movie and not get emotional as you start to ponder these questions and then feel sorry for the victim for having to go through the traumatic ordeal. A feeling of helplessness is usually portrayed to the audience and nothing could possibly feel worse than the inability to affect your own fate.In horror movies there is a complete lack of power on the victimÃ¢â¬ â¢s part, they are going to die, the question is when. We can relate to the anguish of helplessness as we all have felt helpless at times. The victims in horror movies are typically helpless because they are under so much pressure. With the slow build of tension becomes the increasing need to do something. When we see a character buckle under the pressure we feel some king of affection for them and when we see the characters rise under pressure you feel yourself urging them on.Pressure combined with urgency can push a character to accomplish great feats. When we begin to sympathize with the victims or characters the movie can become quite intense. With danger comes a heightened awareness that enhances all emotions, positive Schlenz 4 and negative, drawing attention to every detail. The threat of death often drives people to celebrate life, so we see romance running hand and hand with horror at times. Intensity of emotion and sensation drowns out common sense and this overloading of the senses can appeal to those used to living calmer lives.Horror movies have the ability to scare you half to death and after watching a horror movie one know that there is no way that they am going to sleep for at least another few hours. A horror movie works by engaging a basic defense mechanism; if thereÃ¢â¬â¢s something out there to get you, you donÃ¢â¬â¢t let your guard down, and you certainly donÃ¢â¬â¢t shut off your brain for a few hours. You know that it was just a movie, but some part of your brain, perhaps the part that has the fight or flight reflex, keeps telling you that you are not going to sleep yet, it isnÃ¢â¬â¢t safe and that there is something strange in the corner of your room.You know that it is just your coat but you canÃ¢â¬â¢t seem to convince yourself, it wasnÃ¢â¬â¢t there last night, you donÃ¢â¬â¢t even remember putting it there. Eventually you get up and turn the lights on, confirm that it was just your coat and put it away in the closet. How ever, you are still not safe because now your brain has fixated on something else. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t be embarrassed to feel this way. No matter how scared someone gets when they watch horror movies they are still compelled to watch another one. One enjoys pushing their limits and finding out just what they can stomach is an intense adrenaline rush.Being scared is fun but only as long as they know that in a few hours it will all be over and they will come out alive and unharmed. Schlenz 5 Works Cited Lowenstein, Adam. Films without a Face: Shock Horror in the Cinema of Georges Franju. University of Texas Press, 1998. Carroll, Noel. Ã¢â¬Å"The Nature of HorrorÃ¢â¬ The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. Blackwell Publishing, 1987 Briefel, Aviva. Ã¢â¬Å"Monster PainsÃ¢â¬ Film Quarterly. University of California Press. Spring 2005 Sine, Richard. Ã¢â¬Å"Why We love Scary Movies. Ã¢â¬ October 8, 2011.
Saturday, January 4, 2020
HaggertyÃ¢â¬â¢s is a freelance journalist in Washington D.C.. She has the experience of being a business and real estate reporter, and also the editor for The Washington Post for more than twenty years. Haggerty has also graduated from George Washington University with a bachelorÃ¢â¬â¢s degree. She is a fan of reality television and has written this article to show the effect of reality television in the world we live in today and the messages they are sending to their audiences. Haggerty focuses on popular reality television shows, such as Keeping up with the Kardashians and the Real World, and how their messages can negatively affect the viewers of these shows. She also talks about how these reality shows have an impact on our lives, from perspectives on beauty standards, messages of violence, and social ratings. The author is able to show us how reality television effects us as a culture through the examples, ratings, perspectives, current situations, and reality television to day. This article she has written is within the past six years and is still current today. She shares different perspective on each side of the argument of reality television having negative effects on culture and society and is not biased in her scholarly article backing up a lot of her reasoning and facts with evidence and other reliable resources. The source is accurate and reliable because she has posted her article on CQ ResearchÃ¢â¬â¢s website, which presents award-winning extensive reports on the essentialShow MoreRelatedThe Phenomenon Of Reality Television941 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pagesphenomenon of Reality TelevisionÃ¢â¬ GENERAL PURPOSE: To present new information SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To inform my audience about the history of reality television, the types of reality television, how popular it has become in our world today, and the negative and positive effects of reality television. THESIS/CENTRAL IDEA: There is so much more to reality television than meets the eye. INTRODUCTION I. HOOK: Just imagine. YouÃ¢â¬â¢re sitting on your couch flipping through the channels on your television. You noticeRead MoreThe Impact of Reality Tv on the Teenagers1732 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesImpact Of Reality TV on the Teenagers in Mumbai Nimish Satpute St. Andrews College Instructors : Prof. Meenakshi Kamat : Prof. Jenny Benoy Abstract Reality-based television programming has become a dominant force in television over the past seven years and a staple of most networksÃ¢â¬â¢ primetime lineups. This relatively quick change in the television landscape and the sudden increase in viewersÃ¢â¬â¢ consumption of reality television necessitateRead MoreDoes Reality Television Influence Youth?1480 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesMarch 2016 Does reality television influence youth? Part I Television plays a very large and influential role in spreading modern pop culture. It seems like there is no doubt that television are taking over and regulating many of our business, social value, and lifestyle. Its entertaining aspect led it to become a significant part of our lives. Since it has deeply rooted into our culture, we might believe that it always has been on our side. However, I personally thought that reality shows televiseRead MoreFahrenheit 4511583 Words Ã |Ã 7 Pagestime we live in, filled with new technology and designs to help make our lives better. As wondrous and beautiful as it appears to be, there lies a certain amount of danger that can be nearly as seductive as it is deadly. The beauty often lies behind commercialism, materialism and capitalism. This seductiveness creeps in and brings anguish and chaos in our society, a place where popular culture flourishes. It is far easier to live a life of seclusion and illusion, a life where television is oneÃ¢â¬â¢sRead MoreLiving Out the Reality of Others?1478 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagestodayÃ¢â¬â¢s reality TV shows. Guess whoÃ¢â¬â¢s watching them? Millions of young peopleÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ (Ilisa Cohen, 14). The world is changing in many different ways and people are influenced by many different situations. Teenagers are however, easily influenced by the good, the bad, and the reality. Not only are teenagers observing from the reality around them, but reality that is shown on television and sometimes in commercials as well. Teenagers find role models in the reality shows they see on television today. ItRead MoreThe Negative Effects Of Reality Television1462 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesReality television shows are meant to portray the essence of reality. These shows are created to show the audiences about all the different life situations that they can relate to with their own lives. Thus, reality should be the main component of these shows, however, that is not always the case. Reality shows are staged productions that are affecting society in many ways. The primary component that distinguishes reality-based programs from similar forms of entertainment including traditionalRead MoreThe Media And Television Influences People s View Of Reality1489 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesThe theory that suggests the media and television influences peopleÃ¢â¬â¢s view of reality. George Gerbner and Larry Gross and a few other associates developed cultivation theory in 1976. Ã¢â¬Å"Cultivation Theory postulates that as individuals are exposed to more of a certain kind of television programs, each exposure plants sees that grow into a perspective that is largely influenced by the themes presented in the programs,Ã¢â¬ (Gerbner p.15). There are different assumptions regarding the Cultivation TheoryRead MoreThe Popularity of Reality Shows Among Young People1480 Words Ã |Ã 6 Pagesmass media has an enormous effect and therefore impact on various aspec ts of private and public life. The media (especially television) has become an important type of leisurely activity and entertainment in our lives. Television heroes stormed into our lives like new best friends. We talk about them all the time and we try to be and act more like them every passing minute. We are constantly surrounded with different media images and messages. Within one hour of television viewing, we can be facedRead MoreThe Reality Of Television Has On Store For Me Tonight1547 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesIt is Monday morning and I am already thinking about what reality television has in store for me tonight. There are so many shows to choose from at prime time, so instead of making a hard decision, I simply plan to watch them all. From Basketball Wives and Black Ink Crew to Love and Hip-hop and The Real Housewives of Atlanta, my Monday night seems to be very eventful. It is something about the constant drama that keeps my glued to the TV screen Ã¢â¬â the constant shout ing and fussing, not to mentionRead MoreTV To Blame For Rising Violence Essay examples932 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pagesfor rising violence, says police chief an article taken from the Times on 28th June 2002. The article describes how the content of what young people are watching of television is responsible for rises in criminal behaviours amongst young people. One assumption is that young people are susceptible to the influence of television. In the article Matthew Baggott, the deputy chief constable states of young people, `They are very vulnerable to the influences of the media. nbsp;This influence is
Friday, December 27, 2019
Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2351 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Assisted Suicide Essay Did you like this example? A very controversial topic discussed in recent years is physician assisted suicide. The discussion is if it the patient actually has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Many of the people who oppose physician assisted suicide have arguments based off of religious, moral, and ethical standards. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t waste time! Our writers will create an original "We Have a Right to Die With Dignity" essay for you Create order Those who support physician assisted suicide have beliefs that it ends suffering of those who are already dying and they respect ones choice of death. Even physicians are split on this topic, they argue what is the difference between killing and assisted suicide. Physician Assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of ones own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct assistance of a physician. Physician-assisted suicide is the practice of providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. For me the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the capability of the terminally ill. Many who are in their last stages of life have begged for a physicians help to end their life. These people who are literally begging to be killed are in suffering a great deal and they believe the only way to end their pain is to kill themselves. When some view this belief some see it in a positive manner and the others see it in a negative manner. For the positives they see it as ending ones suffering, from a diseases or condition without pain. For the negatives, however, assisted suicide is the direct murder of someone. After researching both sides of the topic, I believe that terminally ill patients with the mental capacity to understand what they are doing should be given the right to physician assisted suicide. I believe this because assisted suicide gives terminally ill patients the chance to end their suffering when they want, have a better quality of life, supports free will, is accepted by ethical beliefs and has some benefits. Terminally ill patients are going to end up dying. We have machines that will pump your heart for you and continue to circulate your blood but, as far as technology has come today, no technology will end up saving the terminally ill. No technology will be able save them from the pain they go through and nothing will help relieve the immense amount of pain that these patients experience. As the days go the technology/medicine that is keeping them alive becomes a nuisance. The terminally ill patients lives become worsened and they may even start losing their mental capacity. What type of world is it to live in where everyday another piece of you goes and you get closer to death. Many terminally ill patients dont want to live in a world where they are not able to be themselves and ask their physicians to help end their suffering. Many would rather dictate their terms of when and how they go. They would rather be remembered for someone they were than someone they may become. They rather die being self reliant than dependent on someone else. We should respect their choice and this procedure should be just like any other, one self decides. For example, Charlie and Francie Emerick who suffered from prostate cancer, parkinsons, and heart attacks went through immense amount of pain and asked their physician to end their lives. They were given the euthanasia and passed away together holding hands. Their wish was fulfilled and they dictated the terms of their death and when to end their suffering. Another example is David Goodall, he was 104 and experiencing a number amount of disorders, he was in much pain and on his birthday said he was not happy to be alive. He had to travel to the Netherlands to end his life. He played the music he enjoyed, ate his favorite food, went sightseeing, and was surrounded by the ones who loved him the most. Again his mental and physical being were deteriorating and he dictated when and how he wanted to go. Why should we be able to decide ho w someone wants to live or die. Stephen Hawking stated We dont let animals suffer, so why humans?. If they are in so much pain that they would rather die, we should listen and help these people end their suffering. There are many times where technology is not enough and the pain is too much to handle. Without physician assisted suicide we are just prolonging the suffering of a terminally ill patient and these are one of the reasons physician assisted suicide for the terminally ill must be legalized. As mentioned before the quality of life is very important in this debate about physician assisted suicide. Many of the people who would and do request assisted suicide have a disorder which will make them someone who they are not. They will not be able to act the same or understand what is happening to them. They will lose all mental functions and will be suffering without understanding. This would be just as bad as any physical pain. Michelangelo once said one points with the brain not the hand. This shows that the brain is the most important thing in the body and with an ill fit brain it is hard to live. Brittany Maynard a patient with stage four Glioblastoma multiforme said Ive discussed with many experts how I would die from it, and its a terrible, terrible way to die. Being able to choose to go with dignity is my greatest hope. This statement shows the thought process of many terminally ill patients. They would rather be remembered and go as who they are than someone they might become. Many do not want to be remembered as those who went through a great deal of suffering and were not themselves but remembered as someone who had dignity. Many terminally ill patients who request assisted suicide lost hope that they will ever be able to recover from their illness, and what type of world is it to live in without having something to look forward too. Without hope the brain will become depressed and the patients state of mind will deteriorate. Many terminally ill lose their hope to live and consider themselves useless and burdensomes. No person should ever get to this point and should be give the option leaves this world before it comes to that point. Also many terminally ill patients become recipients of anxiety, from the expensive fees and regret from the family taking care of them. A competent terminally ill patient understands that all of the costs for the hospital will fall on their family and this makes them sad and depressed. According to healthline.org a month at the hospital ranges anywhere from 2,000-10,000 dollars. Many families do not have the funds to cover this cost and will be sent into financial ruin. This cost not only creates anxiety for the terminally ill but also ruins the quality of life for the terminally ill family. If the terminally ill had the option of physician assisted suicide they can help guarantee a better quality of life for them and their family. The right to assisted suicide is also part of our basic rights. Every American has the individual right to make decisions about their own life. When one who is terminally ill, fully understands what they are doing and asks the doctor to help them with suicide the doctor should support them. This is supported by the American Constitution: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property . Every person that is a citizen of America has the right of free will provided by the constitution. The right to free will includes the right to physician assisted suicide. We are the controllers of our own destiny and fate, and the right to physician assisted suicide allows us to be the full controllers of life. Just to have the option would make people feel better. This is proven by surveys taken in Oregon, one of the few states in America to have physician a ssisted suicide legal. Just the option of assisted suicide makes people feel like they can take every possible route and take time to decide what they really want. Allowing patients the ability to choose physician assisted suicide is shown in a widely set of common ethical principles. The first ethical principle allowing people the right to physician assisted suicide, is respect of autonomy and self-determination. This principle compels us to respect the right of individuals to make their own decisions about their own lives, even their decision on death. The second ethical principle is compassion for our fellow citizens. Patients which are terminally ill will endure an immense amount of pain both mental and physical. The pain the patients experience is unnecessary and can be prevented with physician assisted suicide. Henceforth, making these patients, our fellow citizens, go through this unnecessary suffering is cruel not compassionate. The right to assisted suicide also does not just help the terminally ill patient but can also help many others. It helps the patient leave their problems. Assisted suicide helps the family recover from a tragedy and continue moving on with society. The family will be allowed to say their goodbyes and a not have to see their loved one be in pain. For example, David Goodall, the 104 year old, was in much pain, but before he preformed assisted suicide, he said goodbye to all his family and friends. In the operation room he was surrounded by his immediate family and this in a sort of way is closure for the family. They got to say what they wanted and saw him in his last moments in the world. The procedure of physician assisted suicide may also help complete strangers. For example, there was a 44 year old woman whose brain stem was damaged, she was completely paralyzed and could only communicate by blinking. She was living off machines. She determined this was no way for her to live and a sked for physician assisted suicide. She also made a request before she died and that was for her organs be donated after she passed away. Her request was fulfilled and both her kidneys and liver were harvested and donated to people in need. Today three people lives were changed because of her choice to end her meaningless life and donate her organs. The possibilities could be endless to how many other people lifes could be changed by terminally ill patients ending their life. Organs can be donated to save other peoples lives and allows the family of the terminally ill to say their final goodbyes and closure. People who oppose physician assisted suicide believe the terminally ill do not have the right to end their suffering, have a right to free will, and have a better quality of life. One of the large components to the opposition is that it is not the physicians job to end someones life that physicians are supposed to heal not kill. In contrast to this point, physicians are already familiar with facilitating the death of their patients. Currently all 50 states of America have the right to refuse treatment and be allowed to die. Also all American citizens have the right to be taken off of life support. The only difference between this and assisted suicide is that the patients may go through immense amount of pain by refusing treatment. Another counter to assisted suicide is that it goes against the hippocratic oath. The hippocratic oath is a 2,400 year old document and is it really appropriate standard of evaluation. Modern medicine and technology have already violated the oath by perform ing surgery. The hippocratic oath states one should never cut for stone and to use the knife on a patient. This part of the 2,400 year old oath is completely violated by todays medical procedures, but these medical procedures, such as surgery are required to help the suffering of the patients. Also Dr. Michael J. Strauss states Though many people assume that the oath is still taken, it is rarely administered in its original form, if at all showing the hippocratic oath is not even used in todays medicine. Dr. Robert Olvera also explains The oath also directs physicians, including me, to help the sick. So a modern interpretation of the oath might be: Do what is right for the patient. The inconsistency provided by the hippocratic oath are one of the reason why we can not use the 2,400 year old document to deny the right of assisted suicide to terminally ill patients. Another argument made by the opposers is that physician assisted suicide will lead to a slippery slope. Slippery slope i s by permitting doctors to help certain patients end their lives, members of some groups may die in disproportionately large numbers and may lead to discrimination in the hospital. After analyzing the data in places where assisted suicide is legal the University of Utah found no real evidence of disproportionate cases of physician assisted suicide. Some argue that assisted suicide is the same as murder but the difference between assisted suicide and murder is that murder deprives the victim of meaningful life that they would have experienced, but physician assisted suicide is only used when the patients future holds nothing but additional suffering. Most of the counter arguments presented by the opposite side can be proven wrong or discredited, giving us more of a reason to support physician assisted suicide. In conclusion, I believe that terminally ill patients with the mental capacity to understand what they are doing should be given the right to physician assisted suicide. I believe this because assisted suicide gives terminally ill patients the chance to end their suffering when they want, have a better quality of life, supports free will, is accepted by ethical beliefs and has some benefits. As said by Socrates, Death may be the greatest of all human blessings.
Thursday, December 19, 2019
In chapter 3, titled Ã¢â¬Å"Congress and the AgenciesÃ¢â¬ , we learn of a few of the many laws, processes and agencies that have been created to better prepare the United States for a national emergency. Since the origins of the United States, the President has always been the lead on emergencies that required attention by the federal government, but the legislative and judicial branches of the government have become more and more involved in making sure that it is done constitutionally. One of the main reasons for this is because of the statutes that have been created because of the response to emergencies. These statutes have been separated into three separate categories. The National Emergency Act is the first actually written law that outlined the power that the executive branch (President of the United States) had when an emergency requiring the federal governmentÃ¢â¬â¢s intervention has happened. This is the first statute. Since its creation, the National Emergency Act has outlined the process in which the president must take to actually declare an emergency. During the 1970Ã¢â¬â¢s is when the legislative branch decided to look into making procedures such as this one uniform. In 1973, a committee put together by congress started to look into national emergencies and emergency powers of the executive branch. They had found that there were approximately 470 laws that somehow delegated the powers of government during times of national emergency. This is why the National Emergency Act,Show MoreRelatedU.s. Federal Department Of Homeland Security1245 Words Ã |Ã 5 Pages Additionally, it became more apparent to the Americans that terrorism has a g rowing global reach. The U.S. commissions looked at different aspects of the U.S. national security, the Hart-Rudman Commission, the Gilmore Commission as well as the National Commission on Terrorism. The members of the Commission as well as members of Congress were well aware that the United States did not have a cohesive and threat-drive counterterrorism strategy. Another issue was allocating money to combat terrorismRead MoreDisaster Management Organization1042 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pageshandling list a number of issues which correctly applied can lead to better DM, in order of importance, these are : Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"CoordinationÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Prevention/PreparednessÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Evidence-based planningÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Local capacityÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Relief-to-recovery orientationÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Emergency health and medical careÃ¢â¬ . Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Capacity to respond to catastrophic disastersÃ¢â¬ The most important issue highlighted has been coordination. This is centered around the following cardinal points: Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"Experienced professional leadershipÃ¢â¬ , Ã¢â¬ ¢ Ã¢â¬Å"CoordinationRead MoreKatrina: What Went Wrong?1726 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesCoast region and killed over 1,300 people. (The White House, 2006, p. 1) After it was all said and done, the nation was shocked at the events that unfolded in Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi and people were left wondering, Ã¢â¬Å"What went wrong?Ã¢â¬ National Geographic reported that the storm originated about a week earlier, 23 August, in the Caribbean and worked its up from the Bahamas making landfall Thursday, 25 August, in Miami. Winds at this time were 75-80 mph making it a category 1 hurricane causingRead MoreThe Impact of the New Deal on the United States Essay1530 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesUnited States: Franklin Delano Roosevelt. By offering hope in his inaugural address, Roosevelt boosted morale and despair from the country for he had developed 15 methods to help the American people in this time period of melancholy. Congress approved all 15 procedures, which were part of the presidentÃ¢â¬â¢s New Deal program. Regardless of itÃ¢â¬â¢s potential to change America completely; many criticized the New Deal for being unconstitutional. However, during the New Deal reignRead MoreDomestic Surveillance During The United States1474 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesAfter the September attacks (9/11) congress started to treat Domestic Surveillance as a number one priority. After September 11th Congress passed a law to use military force for those responsible for the attacks in New York, NY. The go ahead with using military force did not give the President to use surveillance without a warrant. Congress started to pass legislation against counterterrorism efforts. The most controversial measures, including the 2001 USA Patriot Act that gave the US federal governmentRead MoreThe Department of Homeland Security Essay920 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pagesoperational on January 24, 2003 60 days after the Senate passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002 into law. The Department of Homeland Security is the third largest cabinet department, only after the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Homeland Security Act of 200 2, Public Law 107-296 was enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress. The Department of Homeland Security is an executive department of the United StatesRead MoreThe Department Of Homeland Security1602 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesThe Department of Homeland Security The Department of Homeland Security is an agency made up of 22 different federal agencies which were combined in an effort to streamline the United States effectiveness in defending our nation. The core mission of the Department of Homeland Security include prevent terrorism and enhancing security, secure and manage our borders, enforce and administer our immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, ensure resilience to disasters (Department of HomelandRead MoreDrug Crisis : A Public Health Emergency970 Words Ã |Ã 4 PagesPresident Donald Trump declared the opioid epidemic a public health emergency Thursday, ordering his administration to act in addressing addiction and opioid misuse though not providing government agencies with additional financial resources for the matter. The declaration, which will last 90 days with the option to be extended, will allow agencies to reallocate resources and make temporary appointments to expand treatment services. Trump said at the White House East Room the current drug crisisRead MoreAbraham Lincoln And The Emancipation Proclamation1415 Words Ã |Ã 6 Pages- Abraham Lincoln the Emancipation Proclamation An example of a presidential executive order which congress did not authorise would be Abraham LincolnÃ¢â¬â¢s Emancipation Proclamation. Slaves could not be freed constitutionally because they were considered property under the constitution. Lincoln justified this move as an act of war to undermine the war effort in the south. When President Lincoln first proposed the Emancipation Proclamation to his cabinet in the summer of 1862, many of the cabinetRead MoreThe Supreme Court Cases That Have Shaped Our Interpretation Of The Constitution1179 Words Ã |Ã 5 Pages Yakus v.United States, and Mistretta v. United States, three incredibly high-profile supreme court cases, are perfect examples; these cases address the issue of the nondelegation of legislative powers and whether or not it is constitutional for Congress to delegate certain powers to other branches of the United States government. We will examine these three cases individually and determine if delegation is forbidden under the Constitution or legal under certain circumstances. Every Supreme Case
Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Peace is the sturdy child of terror. For me, such Essay a peace is a wretched offspring, a peace that condemns us to live under a dark cloud of perpetual anxiety, a peace that codifies mankinds most murderous instincts. . . .The beast (nuclear weapons) must be chained, its soul expunged, its lair laid waste. This Winston Churchill quote summed up his feelings on nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction. Nuclear weapons have been used in war three times in their sixty-year existence. Two times they were used in World War II and one time in the gulf war. The results of their use put an end to the war, but at the same time, the bombs cost one hundred five thousand people their life. Within in seconds of the first bomb dropping, sixty-six thousand people were dead and another sixty-nine thousand would have everlasting affects on them. The second bomb was not much different. Only thirty-nine thousand people died and twenty-five thousand were injured. Was there any other possible way the war could have been ended without killing over a h undred thousand people? Nuclear weapons pose an intolerable threat to humanity and to our habitat. Robert Norris and William Arkin are both writers for the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists they report The number of operational strategic nuclear warheads is estimated to be about 7,200 approximately the same number as last year. (Norris, Arkin 1). This total does not include countries which are currently making and holding NWs without the approval of other nations. Serious problems will eventually result from this if something is not done about it. Total nuclear disarmament is the only possible way to assure the world that an event like WWII will never happen again. Nuclear weapons main job is to kill, and killing is what they do. Within seconds of these bombs being dropped in WWII, human flesh was disintegrated and burned. There are several different ways of dying from a nuclear attack. The fireball, which develops around an exploding warhead, will evaporate everything and everybody within or around it. Many experts agree, depending on the size of the warhead, the heat from the fireball will cause burns within one mile of the blast and burn most clothing. The blast will demolish buildings and crush humans beneath all of the debris. The force being pushed outward from the blast would toss people hundreds of feet to their death. Meanwhile, a lethal ionizing dose of radiation will kill anybody within a mile and a half of the explosion. People a hundred miles of the explosion may also receive a lethal dose of this radiation, by means of blowing winds. No medical attention would be available after an event like this and a majority of the survivors w ould die from famine or disease. This scenario is a very possible. Nuclear warheads would only produce this type of an event. Not all nuclear weapons are warheads. Gary Cohen explains how nuclear weapons were used in the Gulf War. The Pentagon field tested a new generation of uranium-tipped bullets and shells in the Gulf War. One of the bullets, made of radioactive depleted uranium. (Cohen 1). The American soldiers who handled this ammunition have now been having many medical problems. Of the more than 600,000 U.S. troops that served in the Gulf War, approximately 60,000 have reported medical problems with a variety of symptoms, ranging from respiratory problems, liver and kidney dysfunction, memory loss, headaches, fever, low blood pressure and birth defect among their newborn children. (Cohen 3) Worse yet, sixty seven percent of the children born from Gulf War veterans have been reported as having severe medical illnesses, e.g. missing eyes and digits, blood infections, respirator y problems and fused fingers. It is not fair for the men and women who served in this war and it is not fair for the children. The reasons these bullets were used was because American probably needed to get rid of our nuclear waste materials. Is this the way that these children should have to live out their lives? They are scarred from events that took place even before their birth. Nuclear weapons are a complete risk to every human being on the planet. The world needs to take a step of non-proliferation. This would mean that no more nuclear weapons could ever be produced. This would help decrease the number of nuclear weapons in a country that already holds nuclear weapons, particularly those with unstable governments. There are many problems that are associated with future proliferation. The National Committee on International Security and Arms Control believes that further proliferation, would increase the chances for the weapons to be seized by groups or stolen by terrorists. This could lead to disastrous results. Countries could be held blackmail and be forced to reach these demands of the terrorists. There is also chance of sub-national groups within a country, developing their own stockpile of nuclear material. However, it would be very hard for the groups to turn the nuclear material into a nuclear weapon and actually detonate it. Nuclear weapons do not have to be used in order to be. Possession of nuclear weapons is a huge risk in itself. Accidental launch of a nuclear weapon per hour is about one in a million. Joseph Nye reports The probability of such an event passes 50% with in forty years. (Nye 66) Countries should not be allowed to make any more nuclear weapons. Thirty one thousand nuclear warheads are way too many as it is. All these problems can be eliminated by countries participating in some kind of non-proliferation. Social Complexity EssayMany methods of dealing with and handling nuclear weapons have been proposed. Deterrence, talked about earlier in the essay, is the maintaining of nuclear weapon status, so that other countries will be discouraged to attack. As stated before, deterrence has worked for the U.S. especially in the last twenty years. Countries have feared the United States for that very purpose. There has been talk about deterrence without the nuclear weapons. This is, in actuality, total nuclear disarmament. This is the illegal use of, or making of, nuclear weapons. There have been attempts made at this already. The non-proliferation treaty of 1968 was signed by one hundred nineteen nations. This shows that this type of plan could work. The defense would have to be able to take out the nuclear devices before they could hit the homeland. Next, nations would have to be permitted to hold themselves in a state of readiness for nuclear rearmament. This would be the actual deterring p art of the whole process. Countries would deter against each others blueprints and even get all the way to deter against ideas. This is a highly workable plan. Countries like Iraq, whose governments are unstable, would need to be taking care of first. These types of countries cause a threat to the whole process and there are many of them out there. Nuclear prohibition is another possible method when dealing with nuclear weapons. Not as effective as disarmament, prohibition would make it illegal to have nuclear weapons or to develop them. A large organization would have to be built that would be capable of deterring or punishing countries involved with the illegal nuclear weapons. The organization would also have to respond to major aggression. This organization would be made up of different countries and could cause major aggression between countries. Also, prohibition would be a tough law to initiate. There would be many sources of nuclear weapons that would be hidden by countries for later use. There are many fans of nuclear weapons still out there. Nuclear weapons have been debated about and argued about for the last forty years. Nuclear weapons have proved to be very successful in a war situation. Nuclear warheads put an end to the Second World War. Unfortunately, much innocent life was lost for the end of a war. Nuclear weapons are terrible weapons. With the buildup of weapons over the last couple decades, it has become increasingly difficult to destroy all of them. Some countries like the U.S and Russia have made conscious decisions to destroy their stockpile of them. Never the less, the U.S continues to buy new types of weapons of mass destruction. They fail to see their support of nuclear weapons rubs off onto other countries. Smaller countries believe that they will also need nuclear weapons to protect themselves from the larger countries. They also know that by having nuclear weapons, this will allow them to win wars of politics and geographics witho ut even having to shoot one bullet. Deterrence has worked wonders for the U.S, so why not countries all around the world. This world needs to find some type of prohibition/deterrence agreement that would lower the risk of the catastrophic results in the events of a war.
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
I believe the message that Amy tan was trying to convey, is that language is not the best determinant to gauge intelligence of an individual. And perfect English is not the only English. There are multiple ways of expressing oneÃ¢â¬â¢s thoughts? multiple Ã¢â¬Å"Englishes. Ã¢â¬ Vocabulary can describe but language can express. Language can paint a more vivid picture with critical minutiae. Words are just the icing on the cake, although, the true meaning behind your thoughts lies in your language. As Amy Tan says towards the end of the essay: Ã¢â¬Å"I wanted to capture what language ability tests can never reveal: her intent, her passion, her imagery, the rhythms of her speech and the nature of her thoughts. Ã¢â¬ Tan was attempting to prove that descriptive words have limited potentiality. Language is meant to Ã¢â¬Å"pick up the slackÃ¢â¬ of where words fall behind. Language gives you the feeling that you are actually there. We will write a custom essay sample on Mother Tongue Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Emotions and feelings only become palpable through language. Only then, are you capable of accessing and understanding the true content of an essay, book, or article. People frequently become preoccupied with vocabulary choice, they often lose focus on what truly matters? the message. . There are plenty of ways to convey your message, I just believe itÃ¢â¬â¢s most important that your message is totally understood. Tan realized that people often disregarded the power of language so she decided to compose Ã¢â¬Å"easy to readÃ¢â¬ books to not only reach a larger audience, but to allow the relationship she had were her mother to become tangible through language. In conclusion, I thought this particular essay was easy to understand, but had a deeper underlying message, which could be easily overlooked. Amy Tan taught me that as a writer, through language, I could then expand my horizons. I learned that, being able to articulate with the use multiple Ã¢â¬Å"EnglishesÃ¢â¬ is paramount to becoming an eloquent writer. I thought Mother Tongue was very interesting. That is why I think that there is a big significance to talk to someone over the phone than in person because feelings and emotions can be felt and over heard and my effect the listeners disposition. For example, when you send a text message, no one knows exactly how you feel and in terms of making your emotions tangible we are very limited. Including smiley faces, excessive uses of exclamation marks, and intense capitalization can only do so much. Texting is too indirect. TFacial expressions coincided with language create a deadly match to allow people to understand. That is why personally why I hate talking over the phone. Because there may be some descrepencies with truly comprehanding my emotions. I feel that face to face contact is crucial. For example, if I call customer service a specific issue and I begin to yell my frustrations are transfered into lack of sanity. That is why I feel that use of automated machines that answer your questions whenever you call should be prohibited. If I call about an issue with my MacBook, my frustrations about my MacBook wont be taken seriously if there is no emotion behind it. If someone sees that I am immenlsy frustrated with the issues I am having with my laptop then it may be looked at as a capital priority. On the other hand, if Im talking to a computer (as if it isnt already crazy enought) and I begin to yell at it then it wont understand why I am trying to say.